A Case Study in Psychological Safety

psychological safety

Google’s Project Aristotle was a study conducted to identify the key factors that make a successful team. While researchers originally thought that diversity or a team’s demographics would have the biggest impact, they were surprised by the results of their findings. After analyzing vast amounts of data, the researchers discovered that psychological safety was the most important factor for team success. This article will explore Project Aristotle’s findings and how they relate to Timothy R. Clark’s The 4 Stages of Psychological Safety framework. We will discuss the four stages and how leaders can implement them to create psychologically safe teams.

What is Psychological Safety?

Psychological safety

Psychological safety is the belief that one can express themselves freely without fear of negative consequences. It’s also referred to as a culture of rewarded vulnerability. In a psychologically safe environment, team members feel safe to take risks, be vulnerable, and share their ideas without fear of ridicule or rejection. In essence, psychological safety is the foundation for a successful team. Teams that lack psychological safety are more prone to fail due to issues such as mistrust, lack of collaboration, and low morale. They’re operating out of fear and are usually in survival mode. No team can innovate or create a competitive advantage in that kind of culture.

The Four Stages of Psychological Safety

Timothy R. Clark’s The 4 Stages of Psychological Safety framework offers a roadmap for creating psychologically safe teams. This framework is based on human needs in social settings and follows a basic progression from belongingness needs to candor. Everyone, regardless of demographics, psychographics, upbringing, or beliefs, experiences these needs.

The four stages are inclusion, learner, contributor, and challenger safety. Inclusion safety involves ensuring that all team members feel included and valued. Learner safety encourages team members to seek out new information and ask questions without fear of judgment. Contributor safety is about empowering team members to make valuable contributions and recognizing their efforts. Challenger safety involves embracing healthy conflict and encouraging team members to challenge assumptions and share their opinions.

Psychological safety

As teams progress through the four stages of psychological safety, they create an increasingly safe environment where they intentionally model and reward bigger acts of vulnerability. Once teams reach the fourth stage, challenger safety, they’re empowered with the skills to innovate and make things better without fear of failure or punishment.

Implementing the Four Stages of Psychological Safety

Implementing the four stages requires intentional effort from team leaders. Leaders must cultivate a psychological safety culture by demonstrating empathy, active listening, and vulnerability. As a leader, when it comes to psychological safety, you either show the way or get in the way. Additionally, leaders must encourage open communication, provide constructive feedback, and recognize team members’ efforts. Team members must also be empowered to share their ideas, take risks, and challenge assumptions. Leaders can facilitate this by providing opportunities for growth and development, celebrating successes, and creating a safe space for healthy conflict.

The Impact of Psychological Safety on Team Performance

Project Aristotle’s findings demonstrate the significant impact of psychological safety on team performance. Teams with high levels of psychological safety experience increased innovation, better decision-making, and higher employee engagement. Conversely, teams that lack psychological safety suffer from low morale, decreased collaboration, and higher employee turnover rates. By prioritizing psychological safety, leaders can create an environment that fosters trust, collaboration, and creativity, improving team performance.

What Did Project Aristotle Uncover?

Google’s Project Aristotle study sought to understand what makes a successful team. After extensive research, they concluded that psychological safety was the most critical factor. In other words, the most successful teams had members who felt safe taking risks and being vulnerable with each other. Project Aristotle discovered that the most successful teams had members who were comfortable being themselves and voicing their opinions. When individuals feel psychologically safe, they are more likely to take calculated risks and offer new and innovative ideas.

The study found that teams with psychological safety were more likely to admit to making mistakes and to learn from them. They were also more willing to collaborate and help one another, leading to increased productivity and job satisfaction. It’s worth noting that psychological safety isn’t just about feeling comfortable in a team. Instead, it’s about speaking your mind without fear of judgment or retaliation. It’s about feeling safe to take risks and make mistakes, knowing that your colleagues have your back and support your growth.

Project Aristotle’s findings align with Timothy R. Clark’s The 4 Stages of Psychological Safety model, particularly the contributor safety stage. This stage occurs when individuals feel that they are valued members of the team and that their contributions are recognized and appreciated. In contributor safety, team members feel comfortable sharing their opinions, ideas, and feedback without fear of retribution or rejection.

Psychological safety is critical in the workplace, particularly for innovative teams. The Project Aristotle study has demonstrated that creating a safe environment where team members can take risks, make mistakes, and learn from each other is crucial for success.

Psychological safety is the foundation for a successful team. The Project Aristotle study highlighted the critical importance of psychological safety and how it can be cultivated through intentional effort and leadership. Timothy R. Clark’s The 4 Stages of Psychological Safety framework provides a roadmap for creating psychologically safe teams. By prioritizing inclusion, learning, contribution, and healthy conflict, leaders can foster a culture of psychological safety, leading to improved team performance and overall organizational success.

Case Study: Enhancing Teacher Collaboration (Fictional)

Background: At Riverview International School, Principal Lisa Thompson observed that teachers were hesitant to share ideas and collaborate, leading to stagnant teaching methods and low morale.

Implementation: Principal Thompson initiated a psychological safety program based on Project Aristotle’s findings and Timothy R. Clark’s framework. She began by ensuring inclusion safety, making sure all teachers felt valued and included through regular, inclusive team meetings. She encouraged learner safety by promoting a culture where questions and experimentation were welcomed without fear of judgment. To build contributor safety, she actively recognized and praised teachers’ big and small contributions. Finally, she fostered challenger safety by facilitating open discussions where teachers could challenge existing practices and suggest improvements.

Outcome: Within six months, teachers at Riverview International School reported feeling more supported and engaged. The school experienced a surge in innovative teaching techniques and improved student performance. The enhanced psychological safety led to a more dynamic and collaborative educational environment. Teachers began collaborating more freely, sharing resources, lesson plans, and best practices. The culture of psychological safety encouraged teachers to take risks and experiment with new teaching methods, leading to increased student engagement and academic achievement. As a result, Riverview International School saw significant improvements in standardized test scores and student satisfaction surveys. The positive impact of psychological safety reverberated throughout the school community, fostering a sense of camaraderie and collective ownership of student success. Principal Thompson’s proactive approach to implementing psychological safety transformed teacher collaboration and elevated the overall educational experience for students at Riverview International School.

Contact GSE Soon 👇

GSE set up schools in all areas of the world

GSE manage and operate schools in all areas of the world

CEO and Education Expert Greg Parry

Greg Parry

Internationally renowned for his expertise in education leadership, Greg Parry’s vast experience includes leadership of projects for education institutions throughout Australia, the Middle East, the United States, India, Indonesia, Malaysia and China. Recognised for his numerous contributions in the education arena, Greg has received the Ministers Award for Excellence in School Leadership based on improvements in school performance and a range of successful principal training and leadership development programs, as well as the School of Excellence Award for Industry/School Partnerships and the School of Excellence Award for Technology Innovation. His company GSE (Global Services in Education) has been recognised as having the Best Global Brand in International Education in 2015 and 2016.

Considered one of the premier experts in his profession, Greg has trained teachers and principals throughout the world in areas such as critical thinking, language development and leadership. His expertise in school start up projects, leadership and curriculum development, has made him a sought after authority in these discipline.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is gse_logo_colored_285x60.png


Global Services in Education set up and operate schools in all parts of the world. Governed by a philosophy of global citizenship, every member of the GSE team shares a passion to help shape international education and student achievement through inspiration and collaboration.
Our goal is to meet the highest objectives of every school, teacher, student and parent, with an unwavering dedication to quality education, shared ideals and intercultural perspectives.

– School Management
– Strategic Planning
– Feasibility Studies
– Architectural Conceptual Design
– Interior Design
– Resources

– ICT Planning
– Marketing
– Branding
– Admissions
– Staffing & Recruitment

– Curriculum Design
– School Policies
– School Audits & Action Plans
– Training & Development
– Accreditation & Licensing